Search
Close this search box.

Wall-to-wall dud politicians who have never held a real job

Everyone knows the problem. Our governments are run by politicians who tend to have only ever done one thing in their careers, which is to play politics. With very few exceptions, they are not innovators or entrepreneurs or problem solvers or even community leaders or volunteers. The stunning truth is that most have never held real jobs outside their political party or its patronage network.

This is the biggest political threat to Australia’s future. Nothing else comes close. Complex public decisions about the nation’s future are made by people with arguably the least experience or preparation for making them. Yet business-as-usual in politics and government is hard to buck. Tinkering with minor adjustments won’t change the prevailing culture, but changing the whole political culture seems too big and too hard for most of us to get our heads around.

So what do we do?

In thinking about the problem of career politicians, the unrepresentative character of our political parties, and the stagnation that flows out of parliaments into every walk of life in Australia, there are three reforms that seem pivotal to our ability to change any of this.

1. The first is a requirement that members of parliament have worked for 10 years in a real job. This is easy to do, by making it part of the eligibility requirements to nominate for election to Parliament. There is already a rigorous process in place to determine eligibility based on citizenship which requires documentation from family members, stat decs, etc, which excludes many people. A requirement for a minimum of 10 years in a real job (defined to exclude employment by a politician, party or union) would be no more rigorous or difficult to implement.

At a guess, this would exclude 80% of ALP politicians, 60% of Liberals, and 40% of Green MPs. This would be a good start in getting a more diverse and representative pool of MPs.

But more fundamentally, it is important in recovering the original purpose of representation in a self-governing democracy, which is that a term in parliament to represent your peers is an opportunity for ‘service’, for a limited period of time, as a temporary break from your normal day job. It is not a ‘career’.

2. Because politics is not a ‘career’, we need a limit on the number of terms in parliament that can be served. I favour 3 terms in the lower house, 2 in the upper house, then back to your day job.

3. The third is replacing the notion of a ‘salary’ for MPs with an allowance which recognises the term served is not an open-ended ‘job’ but a limited period of service to your peers.

This is actually what we had in Australia in the heyday of our colonial governments, from 1854 to 1900. These were the years in which our public institutions, infrastructure and culture were established, and these things occurred under the leadership of parliaments which did not pay ‘salaries’ to their members. MPs received an allowance. It was only with the formation of the ALP in 1891 that the push for MP salaries gained sway.

In the debate about why we have wall-to-wall dud politicians, the issue of MP salaries quickly arises and throws everyone off the track. An allowance of $100K pa would deter the duds and attract only those who want to serve for a limited period then get back to their day job.

This problem won’t go away until we take steps to ensure it goes away. Everyone in the country who is not a serving politician has a shared interest in fixing it.

Vern Hughes is the Director of Civil Society Australia, www.civilsociety.org.au.

Subscribe

The Australian Business Executive (The ABE) provides an in-depth view of business and economic development issues taking place across the country. Featuring interviews with top executives, government policy makers and prominent industry bodies The ABE examines the news beyond the headlines to uncover the drivers of local, state, and national affairs.

All copy appearing in The Australian Business Executive is copyrighted. Reproduction in whole or part is not permitted without written permission. Any financial advice published in The Australian Business Executive or on TheABE.com.au has been prepared without taking in to account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any reader. Neither The Australian Business Executive nor the publisher nor any of its employees hold any responsibility for any losses and or injury incurred (if any) by acting on information provided in this magazine. All opinions expressed are held solely by the contributors and are not endorsed by The Australian Business Executive or TheABE.com.au.

All reasonable care is taken to ensure truth and accuracy, but neither the editor nor the publisher can be held responsible for errors or omissions in articles, advertising, photographs or illustrations. Unsolicited manuscripts are welcome but cannot be returned without a stamped, self-addressed envelope. The publisher is not responsible for material submitted for consideration. The ABE is published by Romulus Rising Pty Ltd, ABN: 77 601 723 111.

Subscribe

© 2024 - The Australian Business Executive. All rights reserved. A division of Romulus Rising Pty Ltd, an Australian media company (www.RomulusRising.com).